{"id":90160,"date":"2026-08-07T13:10:39","date_gmt":"2026-08-07T17:10:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/?p=90160"},"modified":"2026-08-10T10:23:58","modified_gmt":"2026-08-10T14:23:58","slug":"ai-code-patching-security-risks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/ai-code-patching-security-risks\/","title":{"rendered":"More than half of AI-generated patches are broken"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">As AI-generated code continues to be injected into all corners of the internet, concerns have risen about an expanding attack surface for malicious hackers to exploit.<br><br>Some have argued that the enhanced cybersecurity capabilities of large language models could serve as a check, finding and fixing vulnerabilities nearly as fast as they\u2019re created.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But new <a href=\"https:\/\/1password.com\/blog\/why-ai-generated-patches-still-require-human-review\">research<\/a> that tested the patching capabilities of two popular commercial models, OpenAI\u2019s ChatGPT 5.5 and Anthropic\u2019s Claude Opus 4.8, found that generative AI is more likely to create an exploitable patch or introduce entirely new bugs than close off a vulnerability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Researchers at 1Password tested the models ability to patch six \u201chigh-impact, high-complexity\u201d CVEs, including the \u201cCopy Fail\u201d vulnerability, a kernel flaw that can give an attacker root access to Linux cloud environments. The overall success rate (or fully patching the vulnerability without introducing new problems), was less than a coin flip at 47%.<br><br>\u201cOur research findings show that, in aggregate across a variety of scenarios, both Claude and ChatGPT had a low rate of successful patch generation, which we define as full remediation of all known exploit paths with no erroneous changes to application behavior,\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/1password.com\/files\/resources\/frontier-models-vulnerability-patches-flawed.pdf\">wrote<\/a> Keith Hoodlet, Axel Mierczuk and Spencer Michaels.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe models often addressed only a subset of vulnerable code paths, added fragile guard code that satisfied tests while failing to address the vulnerability\u2019s root cause, and sometimes introduced subtle changes in the application\u2019s behavior while patching the immediate vulnerability,\u201d the authors continued.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The research suggests that largely autonomous vulnerability-discovery and patching may not yet be effective in fixing the explosion of vulnerable code that is being created in the AI era.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Other private sector research has pointed to a similar problem. A <a href=\"https:\/\/www.veracode.com\/resources\/analyst-reports\/2026-genai-code-security-report\/\">report<\/a> this year from Veracode found that while LLMs have made \u201cenormous strides\u201d in crafting workable code, \u201csecurity is a different story.\u201d Testing across a range of frontier models found the average security \u201cpass rate\u201d for AI generated code is around 56%. Newer models like GPT 5.5 push closer to 70%, while more than half sit between 50-53%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Veracode tested 100 different models and while there was variability, in general a small number of models were showing progress on security patching while the rest have experienced \u201cstagnation.\u201d Similar to the 1Password research, in 44% of Veracode tests the models introduced a detectable <a href=\"https:\/\/genai.owasp.org\/resource\/owasp-genai-llm-top-10-2026\/\">OWASP Top 10 vulnerability<\/a> into the codebase.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">An important caveat: neither report tested newer models, like Anthropic\u2019s Mythos or OpenAI\u2019s GPT-5.6-Sol, that frontier companies tout as having significantly higher cybersecurity capabilities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Those advanced models can identify and fix vulnerable code. Anthropic and OpenAI are distributing them to key industries through <a href=\"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/project-glasswing-anthropic-ai-open-source-software-vulnerabilities\/\">Project Glasswing<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/openai-daybreak-gpt-5-5-anthropic-mythos-cybersecurity\/\">Daybreak<\/a> before foreign or open-source alternatives can compete.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Tim Jarret, vice president of product at Veracode, told CyberScoop that AI tools are still subject to a range of limitations that can make them unreliable for cybersecurity patching without knowledgeable humans in the loop.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">While some vulnerabilities \u2013 like SQL injections \u2013 can be easily patched through automation, other bugs like cross-site scripting, can be exploitable in several different ways and require either a human touch, additional context or both to fully close off. Additionally, models can slowly lose context from prior sessions over time, affecting their ability to complete tasks correctly and raising the possibility they\u2019ll hallucinate to fill in the missing gaps.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cI think we would say, at this point, that Iits premature to treat those as anything other than another code change to the code base that needs to be reviewed and accepted by the team, as opposed to letting the agent merge the code freely,\u201d said Jarrett.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">However, he acknowledged that may not be possible in a world where AI agents are generating exponentially more code for human defenders to review. Some kind of automated code review will be necessary \u2013 preferably not by the same automation tool that produced the code. The ultimate goal is the same as it has always been in security: \u201ctrust but verify.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cNinety percent of the time, the human check might just be \u2018did the cross check look good?\u2019 Do we have a thumbs up?\u2019\u201d Jarrett said. \u201cIn those cases where there\u2019s still something wrong, that\u2019s where you focus your attention a little bit more.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Research finds your AI generated security patch is more likely to fail than fully fix a vulnerability. It might even introduce brand new flaws to exploit along the way.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":624,"featured_media":90164,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"disable_grayscale_images":true,"grayscale_contrast":0,"sponsored_content":false,"display_author_bio":true,"story_type":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[6955,6825,6503,5],"tags":[8084,8019,7258,6835,5919,1545,835],"people":[],"special-report":[],"authors":[7011],"class_list":["post-90160","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ai","category-cybersecurity","category-research","category-technology","tag-claude","tag-gpt-5","tag-anthropic","tag-openai","tag-research","tag-patch-management","tag-artificial-intelligence-ai","author-derek-johnson"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.8 (Yoast SEO v27.8) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>More than half of AI-generated patches are broken | CyberScoop<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"New research shows AI models like ChatGPT and Claude frequently fail to fix cybersecurity bugs, often introducing fresh code vulnerabilities instead.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/ai-code-patching-security-risks\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"More than half of AI-generated patches are broken\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"New research shows AI models like ChatGPT and Claude frequently fail to fix cybersecurity bugs, often introducing fresh code vulnerabilities instead.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/ai-code-patching-security-risks\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"CyberScoop\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/cyberscoop\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-08-07T17:10:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-08-10T14:23:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2026\/08\/GettyImages-2283773187.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2291\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1309\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"djohnson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@CyberScoopNews\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@CyberScoopNews\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\\\/cyberscoop\\\/ai-code-patching-security-risks\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\\\/cyberscoop\\\/ai-code-patching-security-risks\\\/\",\"name\":\"More than half of AI-generated patches are broken | CyberScoop\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\\\/cyberscoop\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\\\/cyberscoop\\\/ai-code-patching-security-risks\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\\\/cyberscoop\\\/ai-code-patching-security-risks\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\\\/cyberscoop\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/GettyImages-2283773187.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-07T17:10:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-08-10T14:23:58+00:00\",\"description\":\"New research shows AI models like ChatGPT and Claude frequently fail to fix cybersecurity bugs, often introducing fresh code vulnerabilities instead.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\\\/cyberscoop\\\/ai-code-patching-security-risks\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\\\/cyberscoop\\\/ai-code-patching-security-risks\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\\\/cyberscoop\\\/ai-code-patching-security-risks\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\\\/cyberscoop\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/GettyImages-2283773187.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\\\/cyberscoop\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/GettyImages-2283773187.jpg\",\"width\":2291,\"height\":1309,\"caption\":\"(Getty Images)\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\\\/cyberscoop\\\/ai-code-patching-security-risks\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\\\/cyberscoop\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"More than half of AI-generated patches are broken\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\\\/cyberscoop\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\\\/cyberscoop\\\/\",\"name\":\"CyberScoop\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\\\/cyberscoop\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\\\/cyberscoop\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\\\/cyberscoop\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"CyberScoop\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\\\/cyberscoop\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\\\/cyberscoop\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\\\/cyberscoop\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/01\\\/CyberScoop-Black.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\\\/cyberscoop\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/3\\\/2023\\\/01\\\/CyberScoop-Black.png\",\"width\":1545,\"height\":186,\"caption\":\"CyberScoop\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\\\/cyberscoop\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/cyberscoop\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/CyberScoopNews\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/cyberscoop\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/channel\\\/UCDG2jjHiZ8r97MCVnsaAkXw\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"More than half of AI-generated patches are broken | CyberScoop","description":"New research shows AI models like ChatGPT and Claude frequently fail to fix cybersecurity bugs, often introducing fresh code vulnerabilities instead.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/ai-code-patching-security-risks\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"More than half of AI-generated patches are broken","og_description":"New research shows AI models like ChatGPT and Claude frequently fail to fix cybersecurity bugs, often introducing fresh code vulnerabilities instead.","og_url":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/ai-code-patching-security-risks\/","og_site_name":"CyberScoop","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/cyberscoop\/","article_published_time":"2026-08-07T17:10:39+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-08-10T14:23:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2291,"height":1309,"url":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2026\/08\/GettyImages-2283773187.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"djohnson","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@CyberScoopNews","twitter_site":"@CyberScoopNews","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/ai-code-patching-security-risks\/","url":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/ai-code-patching-security-risks\/","name":"More than half of AI-generated patches are broken | CyberScoop","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/ai-code-patching-security-risks\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/ai-code-patching-security-risks\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2026\/08\/GettyImages-2283773187.jpg","datePublished":"2026-08-07T17:10:39+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-10T14:23:58+00:00","description":"New research shows AI models like ChatGPT and Claude frequently fail to fix cybersecurity bugs, often introducing fresh code vulnerabilities instead.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/ai-code-patching-security-risks\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/ai-code-patching-security-risks\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/ai-code-patching-security-risks\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2026\/08\/GettyImages-2283773187.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2026\/08\/GettyImages-2283773187.jpg","width":2291,"height":1309,"caption":"(Getty Images)"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/ai-code-patching-security-risks\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"More than half of AI-generated patches are broken"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/#website","url":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/","name":"CyberScoop","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/#organization","name":"CyberScoop","url":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/01\/CyberScoop-Black.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/01\/CyberScoop-Black.png","width":1545,"height":186,"caption":"CyberScoop"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/cyberscoop\/","https:\/\/x.com\/CyberScoopNews","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/cyberscoop\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCDG2jjHiZ8r97MCVnsaAkXw"]}]}},"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"CyberScoop","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop","push-errors":false,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2026\/08\/GettyImages-2283773187.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90160","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/624"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=90160"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90160\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":90172,"href":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90160\/revisions\/90172"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/90164"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=90160"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=90160"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=90160"},{"taxonomy":"people","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/people?post=90160"},{"taxonomy":"special-report","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/special-report?post=90160"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scoopmedia-develop.go-vip.net\/cyberscoop\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/authors?post=90160"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}